
Re: Mystery/Enigmas from DaingMaing – session [6722/7544]
Sorry it took as long as it did for this post. I'll try harder in the future to get a review for you faster.
Before getting in to it:
DaingMaing wrote:
**These are Intermediate Targets worthy of moderate to extensive exploration upon running in a completely blind state***
Again, I applaud you for pushing yourself, and praise you for your effort here, BUT these targets are meant to be explored
moderately to extensively. These are mystery and enigma targets that will most likely need several sessions to flesh out, and if we collectively only explore to the site template and then just stop... well we'll just have a bunch of un-detailed concepts to work with, and that does not solve anything.
So in moving forward, Nathan, please read up on element explorations in the forums as well as reviewing DVD 4. I will help to the best of my ability in regards to relaying and explaining the information that has been previously outlined on this web forum in the explorations arena.
on to the review:
Page 1
- I have a concern that you are using what appears to be four 'prompts'/TRNs on the page. If this is not the case, and the first set of TRNs are just a reminder of what your working on: you must be careful of what you are doing. When you write the TRNs down in such a manner you are prompting your unconscious to be ready for an ideogram that will be immediately following such a numerical formation.
If you in fact have wrote the heading of S1[site] and then underlined it after having transcribed the TRNs on the page from the website, then in the future I want you to write out the referencing TRNs into the upper left hand corner of the page as follows: [6722/7544]. Just to be sure your unconscious is not getting confused. This is a clerical thing,but a necessary one.
When you use the brackets around the TRNs, in essence you are creating a reference point for clerical/administrative things. When you write out the TRNs without the brackets(and one set of four on top of the last set of four numbers) you are prompting the unconscious to be ready to perform the function that is the ideogram.
Page 2
- 'loud' needs to be dissipated as AOL in the same way you dissipate ALL AOL's. It need be the same way every time.
Page 3
- I want you to slow down and scan the page more. It appears you are sketching the archetypes very quickly. I want you to be more deliberate and a little bit slower. You can take up to 10-15 seconds here to fully flesh out the sketch. Again, slow down and scan the page for the archetypes individually before committing to the shape on the page. It will help with better signal line acquisition.
Page 4
- be careful to not trail off of your ideograms. Short, Concise and to the point. Do not make a habit of trailing off.
Page 5
- I am curious how the peaked archetype was sketched? It does not appear in your stage two dimensional column.
Page 6
- looks good
Page 7
- again, stop trailing off in your ideograms. Short, Concise, Fast and to the point.
Page 8
- looks good
Page 9
- There are shapes that are on the page that do not appear in your stage two dimensional column. You need to be sure that if it is in the stage two column it is in the stage three correctly. It is okay to add things in occasionally when impulse urges you to, however, it is a rare occurrence and you should strive to get it correct the first time through. This will take time and repetition.
Page 10
- mostly is good, but that AOL thing your doing has to stop. Same way every time. You could stand to go slightly further down the page.
Page 11
- this is a great example of what it looks like when you trail off from the ideogram. Work at it.
Page 12
- AOL thing again. Same way every time.
Page 13
- looks good
Page 14
- Looks like you followed good protocol in assembling the site template
Page 15
- Stage six can be performed in this manner IF you have enough time to do so. However you need to go back into the forum and find out what is wrong with the heading. You also should do more research on this site to know what you are doing and why, better. I applaud you for trying, but don't worry about doing a Stage Six drawing until you have started to get deeper into the session. The reason why is also written here in the forum. Use the search button and look in the advanced protocol forum on stage six.
Great attempt, but you need to spend more time on target to get better at this as well as get better, more detailed information on a mystery/enigma target.
Do your homework and keep posting it.
As for the other posting:
Norbert77 wrote:
I got the feeling of hollow inside, 'layers like treebark' and fake. Fake as far as I'm concerned
I don't care what you think.
I do care about your work and your publishing it publicly here on the forum for review. Only then can your information be available to scrutiny as well as your structure. It is very easy to post an opinion if you haven't any skin in the game.
If you have posted your session work on this target, and I had missed it, then please point it out to me; so I can apologize.
Opinions are like _____, everyone has one.
If you would like to contribute, I would welcome it, but you need to do the work to have an opinion here; just like any other project or session thread.
If you did not do the work, you should not be posting.