Significant Geophysical Event Forecast

Note: Provisional - proprietary techniques and methods



[2986/4374] Most recent geophysical catastrophe (Anchor cue)
Nepal: 25 April 2015 (Regional May aftershocks)


[6824/6344] Most recent earthquake death (Anchor cue)
Guatemala


[8067/2392] Next geophysical catastrophe
Estahan, Iran: 23 July 2017

[8055/5270] Next catastrophic earthquake
Epicenter: N32 32 30/E51 22 30 (32.54167/51.37500)

[4955/1021] Next earthquake death
Iran


[7147/6400] Next catastrophic asteroid strike
N61 4 10/E50 3 34 (61.06944/50.05944) Proximate to the intersection of Teplichnaya and Raduzhnaya streets, Vizinga, Russia: October 2017

Note: See RV Forum Advanced Projects September 2016 ‘open search’


[4461/8341] Next North America geophysical catastrophe
Juneau, Alaska: December 2018


[5736/1115] Next California earthquake death
Atascadero: December 2018


[0560/9742] Next catastrophic solar flare
April 2020


[5798/8660] Next catastrophic volcanic eruption
Flores Sea, near S6 30/E117 30 (-6.5/117.5): September 2020


[8177/9419] Next tsunami
Arcata, California: 2026

[1072/0893] Next tsunami/origin
Epicenter: ~30 mi south of Shishaldin Volcano, Unimak Island, Alaska



Majordamus

What is it that you are positing about Tachyons and their association with these significant/future geophysical events?

Nothing -- such 'particles' don't even exist. Just needed a project name and liked the contemporary connotation(s) associated with that one, vis-à-vis the subject at hand; I could have easily conjured up other appellations for this particular research and development endeavor. Indeed, the (provisional) report could have been labelled differently, as well -- e.g., 'MIA Planetary I&W Alert' or 'WOFTUS Bulletin 001' (Watch Out For This Upcoming s***), etc.

Regardless, you just displayed a most apropos example of the ole' adage:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/can-t- ... -the-trees



Major Doom

Hello Major,

I have been out of the loop on your recent predictions. But I find this list quite striking.

Are you implying that you have solved the time problem?

You seem to be structuring your sessions with an anchor session (similar to GeoFix); but with time as the focus, not location.

I would love to know more about the mechanics when the time is right. (And, I realize your methods are proprietary).

Nobodysfuel.

Implying? Not to wax acerbic, but what in the hell does it look like!? Did you miss the 'R&D' part?

Anchor cues. 'Time as the focus?'

You seem to be 'quite strikingly' confused (about things that, in terms of the current structured RV knowledge base, were purely and simply presented).

https://www.merriam-webster.com/diction ... 20sequitur

Take a (RV) break, nofuel; degauss and reboot. Then wake back up, (re)introduce yourself to the Matrix via your intrinsic 'higher mind' -- and carry on.

Major Doom

I've ceased RV Tachyon R&D. I don't know if that work is a dead end, but I am not of the mind to pursue this research line any longer. However, one of the MANTIS forecast cues (date notwithstanding) has, so far, proved efficacious (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... order.html).

Here is the Matrix re-target RV Geofix result:

[8055/5270] Next catastrophic earthquake

> Mant'ap Mountain, North Korea

http://www.38north.org/2017/10/mtmantap101717/

http://www.newsweek.com/north-korea-nuc ... ort-696878

http://www.newsweek.com/north-korea-nuc ... ned-688157

http://www.newsweek.com/north-korean-so ... est-698246

Majordamus