Hey Folks,

I have been interested in the Open Search cue for quite some time. I find it quite reliable for predicting the future. In fact, it's one of my favorite things.

Anyway, I have been toying with the idea of being able to predict multiple Open Search results - in order - as Open Searchs seem to line up like items in a print queue.

I was thinking about the following:
1. Run an Open Search session to establish baseline session results.
2. Attempt a cue such as "Next Open Search." If session results were different, this would imply that "Next" could be applied in this case.

My goal would be to look at multiple searches into the future.

My proposed syntax would be:
[nnnn/nnnn]Open Search
[nnnn/nnnn]Next Open Search
[nnnn/nnnn]Next/Next Open Search. . . and so on.

One would have to be careful, as this is all predicated on the first Open Search results, which would flush through the "print queue" and change over time. But one could certainly do a lot of work in a stable 2-week window before the first Open Search occurs.

Next Open Search and Next/Next Open Search was the best cue syntax I could think of.

There may be others, better recognized by the Matrix (e.g. Open Search + 1, etc.).

Any thoughts? Thank you in advance.

Nobodysfuel

What of you look at next major events such as next solsrice/ optimum search or some other events. The next NFL superbowl/ open search. If you get nonsense then we know there won't be a next superbowl

Thanks Norbert for you reply. I'm not sure that Open Search can be applied to a specific topic.

I have heard people suggest:
Me/Open Search

But I'm not sure it works.

I'm not sure I would trust Next Superbowl/Open Search. I will test Next/Next Open Search shortly.

Nobodysfuel.

I didn't mean for it to be applied spefifically to the topic, I mean the "open search " to be applied to the event as a time qualifier, but now I see how that matrix could take that either way. It would be hard to make a cue to look at the next even after the next event. The next NFL superbowl/ next "open search" is just too redundant.