It is currently Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:54 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
 Explanation of "from the top of X something should be percei 
Author Message
Forum Beginner
Forum Beginner

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 3
Post Explanation of "from the top of X something should be percei
The instruction for the s3 drawing says - from the top of X something should be perceivable. Since I had a tall structure (not correct but the right shape) as X, I took it to mean what do you see from the top of that tall building and I drew land & a town. This was evidently not the right interpretation of the stipulation - from the top of X. What are we to look for?

Thanks in advance,

Zenshin


Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:52 pm
Profile
RV Professional
RV Professional

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 336
Location: Virginia
Post Re: Explanation of "from the top of X something should be percei
Quote:
The instruction for the s3 drawing

S3's are sketches based on S2 dimensions.

Quote:
from the top of X something should be perceivable

This is a prompt, think of it as instructions for the unconscious, not instructions for you to draw something that you think may be seen from a specific perspective. This would be a analytical interpretation, which is a form of thinking, even though expressed in a visual form.

Quote:
I took it to mean what do you see from the top of that tall building and I drew land & a town

The tall building/structure was a label given to the dimensions sketched in S3. This is a Aol, triggered by thinking. This label has to be declared as a Aol. If you sketched something that you think you recognized in a S3, or what would be seen around it, declare that as a Aol, don't draw or sketch it.

Quote:
from the top of X. What are we to look for?

There's no need to look for anything, just record the words in the appropriate columns.

Watch the dvd's again, and post sessions for feedback.

_________________
http://www.flusurvivaleverydaystrategies.com/


Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:00 pm
Profile WWW
Forum Beginner
Forum Beginner

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 3
Post Re: Explanation of "from the top of X something should be percei
Thank you for your help.

I think your last section is the answer. Watch again and just forge on. The instruction - from the top of X - certainly threw me to a position from which to view. I still don't quite understand what that instruction means. For example: should it be asked - what is underneath X - that would be a directional cue. From the top something should be percieved seems hard to ignore. I sure don't want to question too much and will just see if it all falls in place down the road. Funny, what came to pen at that prompt was what was in the background and at the right angles lol. I'm surely taking this too seriously. So:

How much of the RV session is visual? I'm not really seeing much and took those glimpses to be AOLs


Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:04 am
Profile
Post Re: Explanation of "from the top of X something should be percei
Don’t get stuck on this... This cue just "gets you to the aspect" and allows the viewer to perceive the target. Alex


Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:34 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.
[ Time : 0.213s | 15 Queries | GZIP : On ]