Remote Viewing Community
http://rvcommunity.net/

1749 3500
http://rvcommunity.net/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=3215
Page 1 of 1

Author:  coqui [ Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:26 pm ]
Post subject:  1749 3500

thank you!

1749 3500

Author:  DLegan [ Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

Are you going to post feedback?

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Author:  JayBird [ Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

Good dimensional site contact, your s3 looks like your dimensional words, more than I can say for most people's sessions.

HOWEVR,
The session is trash.

I see no start time as indicated.

Aspect labels are exploring dead space.

Page 4 is S4 of what stage? I see no header.

Page 4 is also missing a column.

There is no S4 for [A] or [B] 2 pages are missing - you may not skip stages.

Site template has no end of session.

Please take the time to review the dvds again and get the basic stage structure and protocols correct.

You have good dimensional contact with the site, now just follow instructions and you will be doing top quality sessions in no time.

Author:  MultiLnV [ Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

...When you do movements, you might considering using From the top of [X] SSBP

Author:  AnShengDa [ Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

Deleted, due to , no feedback, don't trust the initial thread** starter's setup of the target.
Don't hinder my progress.

Author:  JayBird [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

You posted to a session from a person with only one post. How do you even know this person even knows rv. This topic was just discussed in the main threads.

http://rvcommunity.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3184
Lesson learned.

Author:  AnShengDa [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

Wanted to test the effects of 2nd hand exposure to THC.

Author:  JayBird [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

uggh. Please don't involve me in these experiments with you and your father that your previously edited post above mentioned.

You will need somebody else to guide you from now on. I wont become a part of your learning experience since you want to put up work told by Ed would end in failure. This has been a clear waste of my time. Thank you.

If you were aware the person only had one post, you knew better. Don't expect feedback from coqui. If you do get a response, the chance that the target was set up correctly is nil to none.

Author:  JayBird [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

AnShengDa wrote:
Deleted, due to , no feedback, don't trust the initial thread** starter's setup of the target.
Don't hinder my progress.


Why delete, you should keep it up for others to learn from your obvious mishaps. Perhaps someone else will be able to avoid them. If interested, examine my early posts of ignorance to save you more trouble.

Author:  AnShengDa [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

I am well aware of the previous posts concerning that topic. However, I never ran a session when I have been exposed to it. I wanted to see the difference in data skew for myself, hence the 'experiment'. I deleted my thread b/c I had a strong feeling this is 'Skeptic' from the other thread we all read. I don't want to give him any participation. If it's not Skeptic, this user can learn from this. As I said, I know the post count was low, but I was experimenting. I wish to really just understand the feeling of being skewed from my target if there is a feeling, you know some of the things that weren't mentioned. :D

Author:  capjaneway [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

Are we going to get any feedback or what?!

I have a pretty good feeling about this session.
THE TARGET'D BETTER BEEN SET UP PROPERLY!

Author:  AnShengDa [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

I was pretty sure about my session (although stage 4 is said to be trash) as well regardless of the exposure to some reefer in the air a few days prior :D I'm on a really good streak, so some feedback would be nice ^_^

Author:  Chartless [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings o
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings o
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings o
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings o
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings oo
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmings ooooo
lemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingslemmingsoooooooo

Author:  capjaneway [ Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1749 3500

My thought exactly...

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/